7/28/22, 6:14 PM Unit 4 Assignment Dropbox – PS543 Organizational Leadership – Management, Training, and Evaluation – Purdue University Global
https://purdueglobal.brightspace.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=1182048&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=222764 1/4
PS543 Unit 4 Assignment Rubric Course: PS543 Organizational Leadership – Management, Training, and Evaluation
Criteria 1 Level III 26 points
Level II 20 points
Level I 16 points
Not Present 0 points
Criterion Score
Summary of
Assessment
Tool
/ 26Defines when
a cognitive test
is appropriate
and addresses
the limitations
of cognitive
tests in terms
of selection
and promotion.
Defines when
a cognitive test
is appropriate
and addresses
the limitations
of cognitive
tests in terms
of selection
and promotion,
but is lacking
depth or key
details.
Defines when
a cognitive test
is appropriate
OR addresses
the limitations
of cognitive
tests in terms
of selection
and promotion,
but does not
include both.
● Assignment submitted
does not meet
minimum
criteria.
Criteria 2 Level III 30 points
Level II 24 points
Level I 18 points
Not Present 0 points
Criterion Score
7/28/22, 6:14 PM Unit 4 Assignment Dropbox – PS543 Organizational Leadership – Management, Training, and Evaluation – Purdue University Global
https://purdueglobal.brightspace.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=1182048&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=222764 2/4
Criteria 2 Level III 30 points
Level II 24 points
Level I 18 points
Not Present 0 points
Criterion Score
Assessment
Report
/ 30Writes an
assessment
report based
on the CCAT
report and
Jane’s case
study that
includes
possible
outcomes for
all of the
following:
● Employee placement
● Career path ● Training needs
Writes an
assessment
report based
on the CCAT
report and
Jane’s case
study that
includes
possible
outcomes for
all of the
following, but
lacks depth or
key details:
● Employee placement
● Career path ● Training needs
Writes an
assessment
report based
on the CCAT
report and
Jane’s case
study that
includes
possible
outcomes for
1-2 of the
following:
● Employee placement
● Career path ● Training needs
● Assignment submitted
does not meet
minimum
criteria.
Criteria 3 Level III 7 points
Level II 6 points
Level I 4 points
Not Present 0 points
Criterion Score
7/28/22, 6:14 PM Unit 4 Assignment Dropbox – PS543 Organizational Leadership – Management, Training, and Evaluation – Purdue University Global
https://purdueglobal.brightspace.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=1182048&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=222764 3/4
Criteria 3 Level III 7 points
Level II 6 points
Level I 4 points
Not Present 0 points
Criterion Score
Writing and
Mechanics
(10%)
/ 7Writing
includes all of
the following:
● Reaches the 3-5 page
length
requirement
● Clear and logical
organization
paragraphs.
● Sentences are well
developed.
● Uses correct grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation.
Writing
includes a
majority of the
following:
● Reaches the 3-5 page
length
requirement
● Clear and logical
organization
paragraphs.
● Sentences are well
developed.
● Uses correct grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation.
Writing
includes less
than half of
the following:
● Reaches the 3-5 page
length
requirement
● Clear and logical
organization
paragraphs.
● Sentences are well
developed.
● Uses correct grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation.
● Assignment submitted
does not meet
minimum
criteria.
Criteria 4 Level III 7 points
Level II 6 points
Level I 4 points
Not Present 0 points
Criterion Score
7/28/22, 6:14 PM Unit 4 Assignment Dropbox – PS543 Organizational Leadership – Management, Training, and Evaluation – Purdue University Global
https://purdueglobal.brightspace.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=1182048&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=222764 4/4
Total / 70
Overall Score
Criteria 4 Level III 7 points
Level II 6 points
Level I 4 points
Not Present 0 points
Criterion Score
APA Style
(10%)
/ 7APA Style
includes all of
the following:
● Clearly written in
Standard
English.
● References or academic
sources as
required,
including in-
text citation(s).
● Paraphrased correctly and
accurately;
direct quotes
used minimally.
● Formatted correctly using
either APA
style or
provided
template.
APA Style
includes a
majority of the
following:
● Clearly written in
Standard
English.
● References or academic
sources as
required,
including in-
text citation(s).
● Paraphrased correctly and
accurately;
direct quotes
used minimally.
● Formatted correctly using
either APA
style or
provided
template.
APA Style
includes less
than half of
the following:
● Clearly written in
Standard
English.
● References or academic
sources as
required,
including in-
text citation(s).
● Paraphrased correctly and
accurately;
direct quotes
used minimally.
● Formatted correctly using
either APA
style or
provided
template.
● Assignment submitted
does not meet
minimum
criteria.
Level III 57 points minimum
Level II 43 points minimum
Level I 1 point minimum
Not Present 0 points minimum
,
PercentileRaw Score
The CCAT measures cognitive aptitude, or general intelligence. This test provides an indication of a subject’s ability to solve problems, digest and apply information, learn new skills, and think critically. Cognitive aptitude is one of the most accurate job predictors of job success for any position.
Ability to reason using numbers and numerical concepts. Also measures logic and analytical thinking.
Reasoning and comprehension of words, constructive thinking, and attention to detail.
Ability to visualize, make spatial judgements, and problem solve; correlated to general intelligence.
24 50
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
Vince Sample achieved an overall score of 24, which means Vince answered 24 questions correctly. This corresponds to a percentile rank of 50, meaning Vince scored better than 50% of the people who have taken this test. Below are details of how Vince performed in specific sub categories.
58 62 24
Sample – CCAT Score Report – Page 1 © 2022 Criteria Corporation. All Rights Reserved. • www.criteriacorp.com • (877) 909-8378
Vince Sample Position: Sample Test Portfolio Test Date: Jan 17, 2022 Event ID: ABC-D1Fg-2H3I-jklmN | Test Ver: 1.0
*Based on national norms compiled by Criteria Corp.
50403020100 (Range: 23-38)
50403020100 (Range: 20-37)
50403020100 (Range: 29-42)
50403020100 (Range: 21-35)
50403020100 (Range: 23-37)
50403020100 (Range: 21-35)
50403020100 (Range: 22-37)
50403020100 (Range: 18-34)
50403020100 (Range: 26-41)
50403020100 (Range: 22-40)
50403020100 (Range: 23-37)
50403020100 (Range: 22-36)
50403020100 (Range: 29-42)
50403020100 (Range: 18-30)
50403020100 (Range: 21-40)
50403020100 (Range: 18-32)
50403020100 (Range: 24-39)
50403020100 (Range: 23-40)
50403020100 (Range: 20-35)
50403020100 (Range: 26-42)
50403020100 (Range: 20-35)
50403020100 (Range: 24-39)
Vince Sample | Score: 24
In Range
In Range
Below
In Range
In Range
In Range
In Range
In Range
In Range
In Range
Below
In Range
In Range
In Range
Below
In Range
In Range
In Range
In Range
In Range
Below
In Range
Sample – CCAT Score Report – Page 2 © 2022 Criteria Corporation. All Rights Reserved. • www.criteriacorp.com • (877) 909-8378
,
The case study below is an example of data from the results of a Criteria Cognitive Aptitude Test (CCAT). The CCAT measures cognitive aptitude and critical thinking skills. It indicates an applicant’s ability to solve problems, learn new skills, and comprehend and apply information. Review the following case study and score report results.
Case Study: Jane
Jane is applying for an administrative assistant position with the marketing department. Her duties may include fielding telephone calls, receiving and directing visitors, word processing, filing, and faxing. Extensive software skills are required, as well as Internet research abilities and strong communication skills. Additional duties include assisting with trade show and event planning, creating or updating presentation software files, tracking budgets and expenses, and communicating with external creative service providers.
Jane’s score on the CCAT was 29 corresponding to a percentile rank of 58. This means that she scored better than 58% of the people who have taken this test.
Here are more details regarding her test results:
Spatial Reasoning: 85%
This domain measures the ability to see the ‘big picture’ or the overarching idea or larger perspective of a situation, make spatial judgments, and problem solve. Spatial reasoning is correlated to general intelligence.
Verbal Ability: 40%
This domain measures the ability to reason and comprehend words, constructively think about situations or scenarios, and one’s ability to focus on details.
Math and Logic: 26%
This domain measures the ability to reason using numbers and numerical concepts. It also measures the ability to apply logic and analytical thinking.
Review the CCAT sample report that is available from CriteriaCorp. After reviewing the report, and based on the information from the Jane case study example, write an assessment report that describes the possible outcomes for this employee regarding the following areas:
· Employee placement
· Career path
· Training needs
Define when a cognitive test is appropriate and addresses the limitations of cognitive tests in terms of selection and promotion. Your assignment should be a 3–5-page essay, not including the title and reference pages, and should include the following elements:
· Title page: Provide your name, title of assignment, course and section number, and date.
· Body: Answer all the questions in complete sentences and paragraphs.
· Your responses should reflect professional writing standards, using proper tone and language. The writing and writing style should be correct and accurate, and reflect knowledge of skills and practice in the human service profession.
· Reference page: Sources listed in APA format.
· Include a minimum of three scholarly or academic sources to support your responses and conclusions.
· Use Arial or Times New Roman 12-point font, double-spaced and left aligned.
· Use standard 1" margins on all sides.
· Use APA formatting and citation style.
This assignment assesses the following Course Outcome:
PS543-2: Analyze employee placement, training needs, and career path based on employee assessment data.
Defines when a cognitive test is appropriate and addresses the limitations of cognitive tests in terms of selection and promotion.
Psychology
We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework.
Yes. We have posted over our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications and future communication.
1. Click on the “Place order tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER INFORMATION" section and click “PRICE CALCULATION” at the bottom to calculate your order price.
3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.
Need this assignment or any other paper?
Click here and claim 25% off
Discount code SAVE25